Building a Better Ballot
How fonts, type size, and shading improve our democracy
After the 2000 election, in which Florida's "butterfly ballot" changed the outcome of the presidential race, a group of Chicago graphic designers had an idea: Why not use their expertise to produce simpler, easier-to-understand ballots? Thus was born Design for Democracy, which has partnered with Cook County and the state of Oregon on ballot design and produced a new book, Design for Democracy: Ballot + Election Design (University of Chicago Press, $65). "It's not about beauty or creativity—it's about legibility," says the book's author, Marcia Lausen, director of the School of Art and Design at the University of Illinois at Chicago. She points out that votes for judicial candidates on the Cook County ballot significantly increased with the new design. For this primary season, Lausen analyzed the layouts of the 2007 Cook County ballot (which shows her handiwork) and City of Chicago ballot (which does not).
Mouse over the checkmarks and X's to read Lausen's comments.
Did you like what you read here? Subscribe to Chicago Magazine »
Email
Print
del.icio.us
digg
yahoo!
Comments
Feed
Comments are moderated. We review them in an effort to remove foul language, commercial messages, and irrelevancies.
Reader Comments:
THE WARD AND PRECINCT INFORMATION IS NOT RELEVANT TO THE VOTER?
This just shows how little you know about the ballot and election process and the duty that election judges perform for next to no thanks or appreciation. Not to mention the logistics behind getting the correct ballot to the correct location on election day.