Downtown Chicago Grows, and Grows Younger, as the Rest of the City Ages and Shrinks
One of the ongoing themes in American cities over the past decade has been their Europeanization—their specific physical transformation, as Aaron Renn describes: "Whereas in the past the inner city was decayed and the suburbs were nice, this trend is starting to invert as central cities gentrify and it is inner ring suburbs that now find themselves in decay." Renn thinks this trend has been a bit overrated as a national phenomenon, but it's definitely happening in Chicago, as you might have read recently:
Rob Paral, a Chicago demographer, says the city's downtown population growth reflects several underlying economic factors, including downtown revitalization and an expanding job market.
But though places like the South Loop and West Loop have benefited from the trend, Paral says, its effects quickly fade the farther out you go.
"There's a big difference between what you see in downtown and what you see in other parts of the city," he said. "We wish it would be happening within 20 miles of City Hall, but no city has that kind of prosperity."
But it's not just 20 miles out where it fades; it's just outside the loop, as the Census Bureau's maps show.
There's been some sporadic growth near Midway—Clearing, West Lawn, and West Elsdon, likely due to an influx of Hispanic immigrants and a subsequent baby boom. Otherwise, the growth has largely been confined to downtown and the near north side. Unsurprisingly, the growth runs northwest along a thick transit corridor, between the Blue Line, Milwaukee Avenue, I-90, the Brown Line, and the Red Line.
The result is a younger population in the inner city, and an aging one surrounding it, though the geography is a bit different:
Within two miles of City Hall, Chicago had the largest population increase of any major urban area over the past decade, from 133,426 to 181,714, an increase of 36 percent (New York's grew by 37,422). Outside of that radius it's a different story, as Wendell Cox details.





E-Mail
Print
Comments to this blog are moderated. We review them in an effort to remove foul language, commercial messages, and irrelevancies.
The growth of downtown populations is a tremendously important trend for not only our cities but for the US as a whole. Downtown residents support downtown retail and dining, and provide opportunities to save and adaptively reuse historic buildings. Yet, despite a host of downtowns that are gaining population, particularly in market rate units, Wendell Cox and his colleague Joel Kotkin continue to promote suburban sprawl and downplay the gains made by urban areas.
Cox and Kotkin like to point our that suburbs continue to be the place where most people live, and where growth continues. Well, of course! Suburbs have had the last 60 years to develop, gobbling up farmland with few restrictions. Downtowns, on the other hand, suffered forty years of decline after WW II, and are only now showing significant gains in population, despite high land prices and other restrictions.
Cox credits New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani with the reduction in crime in his city, but much credit should go to his police chief and to George Kelling, who developed the "broken windows" theory of crime prevention, as well as to the business improvement districts that patrol the streets throughout New York.
Simply put, Cox and Kotkin continually compare downtowns and suburbs as if they were comparable development locations. They are not. This is a classic "apples and oranges" comparison, and they should know better. Downtowns represent typically about 1 to 3% of the land mass of metro areas, and are largely built out. They could not possibly accommodate, even under the most ideal circumstances, the type of growth occurring in the suburbs. A much more accurate picture of downtown revitalization is to look at trends -- increases or decreases in office, retail, dining and residential development, hotel occupancy, nightlife, tourism, crime -- those are the measures that count, not some fatuous comparison with suburbs.