Edit Module
Edit Module
Edit Module
Edit Module

Can Any Republican Beat Barack Obama?

As Barack Obama prepares to launch his fundraising campaign for the 2012 election with a goal of one billion dollars, it’s time to start looking at his competition. Oh, and Donald Trump.

Michele Bachman Donald Trump Mitt Romney

The 2012 presidential race sort-of officially begins Thursday at Navy Pier, when Barack Obama hosts a fundraiser with wait-he’s-not-the-MVP-yet? Bulls guard Derrick Rose. Tickets are $250, the first step towards what advisors are saying is a one billion dollar goal, or about a third more than the $745 million raised in 2008.

On one hand, that’s a lot of money to raise in a crap economy from a less than enthusiastic base. On the other hand… could anyone beat him? With a couple exceptions, his likely competition is less than promising.

Tim Pawlenty (10-1): Former governor of Minnesota, the first Republican to form an presidential exploratory committee.

Pros: Was the Republican governor of a purple state. Genial. Relatively low profile (see also Cons). Wonky, but not intimidatingly so. Not a bottom-feeding birther. Can probably be counted on to run a competent campaign. Appealing personal story.

Cons: To know him may not be to love him. Fiscal record as governor will raise flags for both centrists and conservatives; reliance on taboo stimulus funds puts him in a bind. Has already given the worst speech of the 2012 campaign cycle:

Pawlenty also worked hard to relate to the college audience. Maybe too hard. He referred to Charlie Sheen: “Now we may not in this room have tiger blood like he does. But we do have something else in common with him. There’s going to be a lot of winning on the Republican side.”

Wild Card: He’s the Michael Bay of centrist Republican campaign advertising.

Mitt Romney (3-1): Former Massachusetts governor, the second Republican to have an exploratory committee.

Pros: Looks like the love child of Gary Cooper and a bald eagle. Record as moderate Republican governor of a historically Democratic state will be appealing to fans of centrism, “civility,” might even have some appeal to disaffected conservative Dems.

Cons: Terrified of his own moderate shadow. Attempts to burnish his reputation as a doctrinaire conservative have led to much awkwardness and hilarity; he seems as comfortable in a tea party guise as a dog does in a holiday sweater. Only he seems less aware of it than the dog.

Wild Card: Romney : Mormons :: JFK : Catholics.

Mike Huckabee (5-1): Former governor of Arkansas.

Pros: Far and away best public speaker of the lot. Not immoderate. Very Christian.

Cons: Very conservative Christian. Not not-immoderate.

Wild Card: Maurice Clemmons.

Michele Bachmann (75-1): Representative from Minnesota (St. Cloud, St. Paul suburbs), founder of House Tea Party caucus.

Pros: Strong base, exceptional fundraising prowess for a House member.

Cons: Most apt comparisons: Sarah Palin, Bob Dornan.

Wild Card: Public speaking.

Donald Trump (1,000,000-1; no, I don’t care that he’s polling well): Celebrity developer, television host.

Pros: A rich narcissist would probably understand what’s going on in America just as well as anyone.

Cons: Not actually running for president.

Wild Card: Seriously, he’s not actually running for president, right?

Sarah Palin: See Donald Trump.

Rick Santorum (1,000-1): I think he works for Fox News or something.

Pros: Um… more name recognition than Tim Pawlenty?

Cons: I follow politics pretty closely, and I have no idea what Santorum does now.

Wild Card: Dan Savage.

Mitch Daniels (100-1): Governor of Indiana.

Pros: Reputation for fiscal conservatism, though a moderate compared to some of his peers. Former Office of Management and Budget director.

Cons: OMB director for George W. Bush. The Republican equivalent of Mike Dukakis.

Wild Card: None; more boring than Pawlenty. May not actually run.

Haley Barbour (500-1): Governor of Mississippi.

Pros: Well-connected former lobbyist.

Cons: Well-connected former lobbyist.

Wild Card: Nathan Bedford Forrest.


Edit Module


Edit Module
Edit Module
Submit your comment

Comments are moderated. We review them in an effort to remove foul language, commercial messages, abuse, and irrelevancies.

Edit Module